AI visibility and competitor tracking, priced like a utility.
Hoxigen is the marketing department: it finds where you are missing from Google and AI answers, writes and publishes the content across your blog, social, and video channels, and shows what changed.
Opinly is a tracking product and a good one. For a few dollars a month it watches what ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude say about you, keeps daily positions for up to 300 keywords, and treats competitors as first-class, metered objects. If what you want is a number on a dashboard, it is genuinely hard to argue with the price.
It stops there on purpose. Opinly has no social posting, no video and no lead capture, and nothing in it writes or publishes the page that would change the answer it just measured. It tells you the gap exists. Closing the gap is still your afternoon.
Hoxigen runs the other half in the same product: it finds the gap, writes the article, post, story or short, publishes them across your channels, and shows what moved. Where Opinly is ahead of us — daily keyword history and competitors as tracked entities — it is ahead cleanly, and we have said so below rather than around it.
Written so their own team would call it accurate. If one of these is what you are buying, buy it from them.
$4 to $28 a month is utility pricing. Nothing in this category costs less, and the tracking you get for it is real tracking, not a teaser.
Three answer engines — ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude — with competitors metered per tier at 3, 8 and 10. This is the job it set out to do and it does it.
50, 100 or 300 tracked keywords updated daily. It is their headline meter, and it is a capability we do not have.
Sold as a paid module. We decided not to build a billed crawler at all, so if an audit is part of what you are buying, they have one and we do not.
The chip on each row says who wins it. Some of them are not us.
Weekly sampled scans across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and xAI on paid plans, keeping the answer itself, its citations, brand and competitor mentions, sentiment, recommendation position and week-over-week movement.
Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.
No. We compare the current Search Console period with the previous one and store no durable per-query series.
50, 100 or 300 keywords with daily updates, by tier. Their headline meter.
No. A free-text field plus per-scan mentions, with no share-of-voice history across scans.
Metered per tier — 3, 8 or 10 competitors — as first-class objects.
SEO articles with images, FAQ schema and links to your earlier posts, plus social posts, stories and video, in 17 languages.
Drafts and illustrates articles too - this is a real part of the product, not a checkbox. Articles only: no social, no video.
Signed webhook to your own domain, our own WordPress plugin, the built-in blog, and Shopify, Wix and Webflow connectors in beta — plus posting straight to your social channels.
Publishes to WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, Wix and Framer, plus an SDK and REST API. Its connector list adds Framer over ours; ours adds your social channels.
Seven channel types and YouTube scene videos, from the same queue as the articles.
None of it.
No crawler, by decision. Article-level checks and evidence-backed next actions instead.
Sold as a paid module.
Every item is generated ahead and waits in a queue you can edit, approve or reject — from the app or Telegram. Ignore it and it ships on time anyway.
Publishes on a schedule. We did not verify from inside an account what review step comes first.
You would find these out in week two anyway. Here they are in week zero.
They keep a daily position series for up to 300 keywords. We hold two Search Console periods and compare them. If tracking movement day by day is the job, they do it and we do not.
Theirs are metered objects you can watch over time. Ours are a free-text field and whatever this week's scan mentioned — no share-of-voice trend.
Nothing we sell costs $4 a month and nothing we could sell would. We run generation, publishing and video; that is a different cost base, not a cleverer one.
The full list of what we do not do is on the alternatives page.
Everything on this page about a rival comes from its own public pricing and marketing pages, read on the date shown. We have not tested inside a paid account, and where a number is the rival's marketing claim rather than something we measured, we say so. Think we have something wrong? hello@hoxigen.app — we will correct the page.
Nothing publishes until you connect a channel, and every item waits for you first.